Legal Ethics in the News - NYC Bar Association Legal Ethics in the News - NYC Bar Association

Explaining the Conflict Issues and the Special Counsel Rules As They Apply in the Justice Department's Investigation of Donald Trump.

Stephen Gillers is the Elihu Root Professor of Law Emeritus and Barbara Gillers is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law.

Alex Jones’s law firm reportedly sent opposing counsel years of Jones’s text messages and they were used to cross-examine him. Could the firm have mitigated the harm through what has come to be known as claw back? Are Jones’s lawyers now exposed to discipline or damages?

Famed appellate lawyer Paul Clement left Kirkland when the firm decided to stop advocating for Second Amendment rights. Clement had just one a big Second Amendment case in the Supreme Court. On the flip side, lawyers are sometimes shamed because of the clients they do represent. Who’s right here? No one did anything unethical. But can lawyers be criticized for the clients they accept or reject?

Stephen Gillers is the Elihu Root Professor of Law and Barbara Gillers is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law.

About 100 prosecutors nationwide have said they will not prosecute abortion cases. Yet their client is the state and if the state has made abortion a crime, can a local prosecutor ethically refuse to enforce the law?

Also, the question has been asked whether, if indicted, Trump could rely on the advice of counsel that his conduct was legal, and thereby create a reasonable doubt about his criminal intent. What is the advice of counsel defense and could it work here?

Stephen Gillers is the Elihu Root Professor of Law and Barbara Gillers is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law.

See show notes and references at https://www.nycbar.org/media-listing/media/detail/can-a-prosecutor-refuse-all-abortion-cases-if-indicted-can-trump-rely-on-the-advice-of-counsel

In June, the New York judiciary adopted one of the most far-reaching disciplinary rules in the nation prohibiting discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment, in the practice of law. But the journey to that adoption has gone on for nearly 30 years and has divided courts and bar groups nationwide. The Third Circuit is expected to decide a test case on the constitutionality of Pennsylvania's version of the rule later this year.

See show notes at https://www.nycbar.org/media-listing/media/detail/new-yorks-new-disciplinary-rule-against-harassment-and-discrimination-in-law-practice

The recent trial of Michael Sussmann for lying to the FBI about his motives for giving it information that purported to show a link between a Russian bank and Trump interests raises two questions in the world of legal ethics and federal criminal law. The first asks when if ever considerations other than to convict can be a valid basis to indict. The second explores the meaning of truth and falsity in the professional conduct rules and in the statute used to prosecute Sussmann.

Stephen Gillers is the Elihu Root Professor of Law and Barbara Gillers is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law.

Clients sometimes need services related to their legal needs but which are not legal services and which nonlawyers may also provide. Lawyers may see this situation as offering an opportunity for them to offer those services including through an entity separate from their law practice. Separately, this podcast reports on further developments facilitating what has come to be known as the practice of law in the Metaverse.

Stephen is the Elihu Root Professor of Law and Barbara is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law.

See this episode's references at https://www.nycbar.org/media-listing/media/detail/what-rules-govern-a-law-firms-ancillary-business-law-practice-in-the-metaverse-new-developments