70 episodes

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments Oyez

    • Government
    • 4.7 • 588 Ratings

Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.

    Thornell v. Jones

    Thornell v. Jones

    A case in which the Court will clarify the methodology for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. Washington.

    • 1 hr 4 min
    Fischer v. United States

    Fischer v. United States

    A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c), which prohibits obstruction of congressional inquiries and investigations, includes acts unrelated to investigations and evidence.

    • 1 hr 40 min
    Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio

    Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio

    A case in which the Court will decide whether a Fourth Amendment malicious-prosecution claim can proceed as to a baseless criminal charge so long as other charges brought alongside the baseless charge are supported by probable cause.

    • 58 min
    Snyder v. United States

    Snyder v. United States

    A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) criminalizes gratuities, i.e., payments in recognition of actions a state or local official has already taken or committed to take, without any quid pro quo agreement to take those actions.

    • 1 hr 38 min
    Connelly v. United States

    Connelly v. United States

    A case in which the Court will decide whether the proceeds of a life insurance policy taken out by a closely held corporation on a shareholder in order to facilitate the redemption of the shareholder’s stock should be considered a corporate asset when calculating the value of the shareholder’s shares for purposes of the federal estate tax.

    • 53 min
    Erlinger v. United States

    Erlinger v. United States

    A case in which the Court will decide whether the Constitution requires a jury trial and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant’s prior convictions were “committed on occasions different from one another,” as is necessary to impose an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act.

    • 1 hr 33 min

Customer Reviews

4.7 out of 5
588 Ratings

588 Ratings

XheanortXIII ,

Simple podcast but exactly what i need

Thank you for what you do

perdiemmedic ,

I enjoy listening to the arguments

And then listening to companion type podcast who discuss and give context

ballinb5 ,

Super delayed

Hard to keep up with the news. Sometimes arguments take days to weeks to show up in podcasts

Top Podcasts In Government

Strict Scrutiny
Crooked Media
Anne Hidalgo - Paris en Commun
Paris en Commun
5-4
Prologue Projects
The Lawfare Podcast
The Lawfare Institute
The Chris Plante Show
WMAL | Cumulus Podcast Network | Cumulus Media Washington
Red Eye Radio
Cumulus Podcast Network

You Might Also Like

Divided Argument
Will Baude, Dan Epps
We the People
National Constitution Center
Cases and Controversies
Bloomberg Law
Amarica's Constitution
Akhil Reed Amar
Strict Scrutiny
Crooked Media
Bloomberg Law
Bloomberg

More by Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Announcements
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2010 Term Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2011 Term Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2013 Term Arguments
Oyez
U.S. Supreme Court 2012 Term Arguments
Oyez